|
Post by The X-Factor on Nov 14, 2008 2:46:41 GMT -5
Well, here it is again. Another Barren Mind review.
In terms of laughs, energy (from both the audience and cast), originality, and content, this show was decent, and it certainly didn't lack in the "oh shit" moments. I kept thinking at times, "these guys are pushing it." The energy was considerably higher than last week's show, especially during the "Do Run Run" and "I Object" scenes.
Has anyone noticed that Barren Mind is using more "Open Scenes" lately? Under Stacey's direction, they've used more in the last two months than the last three directors. When I first saw them, I didn't really like them, but now I see the logic in them. It provides a nice challenge to those to partake in open scenes, because there's no gimmicks, and it forces them to really be creative.
While he's always good on Farce Side, I think that Barren Mind gives Joel the chance to show off his eccentricity, which is a plus given that his personality.
That's all for now.
|
|
|
Post by a woman on Nov 14, 2008 18:30:01 GMT -5
why is this post called womanizer?
|
|
|
Post by The X-Factor on Nov 14, 2008 21:34:39 GMT -5
I give all my reviews song titles. Didn't you notice?
|
|
|
Post by a woman on Nov 15, 2008 4:33:07 GMT -5
yes, but why womanizer in particular. I would assume you use songs to parallel as a theme of the show you saw. for instance, if i were to see a cowboy comedy show i would title my review "sweet home alabama." or if i were to see a comedy show with lots of 80's themes i would title it "girls just wanna have fun." but "womanizer" seems to have no context, except that you use songs to title your reviews. what's the deal?
|
|
|
Post by buy wow gold on Oct 30, 2009 3:49:53 GMT -5
|
|